
You are ready to file your trademark with the INPI (French Patent and Trademark Office) and you are wondering how much it will actually cost. The official rates are public: starting at 190 euros for one class of goods or services. But the real cost of filing a trademark with the INPI often exceeds that first estimate, once additional classes, possible irregularities to correct, or the use of a representative to secure the procedure are added in.
This article details the applicable official rates, how the Nice Classification works and its direct impact on the final bill, the concrete steps to validly register a trademark, the risks of a poorly prepared filing, and the financial aid schemes that can reduce the burden for eligible companies.
The rates applied by the INPI (French Patent and Trademark Office) are set by regulation and officially published. The fee structure rests on two components: a base fee covering the first class of goods or services, and an additional fee for each extra class. The filing method, online or paper, has a direct impact on the final amount.
| Filing type | 1st class | Each additional class | Renewal (1st class) | Renewal (additional class) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online filing | EUR 190 | EUR 40 | EUR 290 | EUR 40 |
| Paper filing | EUR 290 | EUR 40 | EUR 390 | EUR 40 |
Note: these amounts correspond to the official INPI fees currently in force (decree of December 27, 2023). They are subject to change; the current rates should be checked on the INPI website before any filing.
Online filing therefore offers a 100 euro saving on the base fee compared with paper filing, with no difference on additional classes. For an applicant selecting three classes, the total amount of INPI fees comes to 270 euros online versus 370 euros on paper.
These fees cover only the processing of the registration application by the INPI. They do not include:
The effective cost of registering a trademark with the INPI therefore includes these additional items, which can significantly exceed the official fees depending on the complexity of the file and the number of classes selected. The decision to file a trademark in one, two, or several classes is one of the main levers for adjusting the total budget.
The Nice Classification is an international system adopted under the Nice Agreement of June 15, 1957, organized into 45 thematic classes: classes 1 to 34 cover goods, and classes 35 to 45 cover services. Any registration application filed with the INPI must indicate the classes in which the trademark will be protected, because the protection conferred by article L. 711-1 of the French Intellectual Property Code is limited to the goods and services covered at the time of filing. Outside those classes, the trademark does not enjoy protection.
Selecting the classes is not an administrative formality: it is a strategic decision that determines the actual scope of the protection of your trademark. Choosing too few classes exposes you to situations where a third party uses a similar sign for a related activity without your being able to act. Conversely, multiplying classes that have no link to your actual activity needlessly increases the fees and can weaken your registration: an owner that does not seriously use the trademark in a class for an uninterrupted period of five years risks losing its rights in that class, pursuant to article L. 714-5 of the French Intellectual Property Code.
To calibrate the trademark filing as precisely as possible, a prior audit of your current activity and your foreseeable developments over three to five years is essential. The goal is to identify the goods you sell, the services you provide, and the adjacent activities you might carry on under the same trademark.
Concrete example. A startup that develops software sold online and runs training sessions on its use should consider at least three classes: class 42 (software, IT and technology services), class 9 (recorded software, digital applications), and class 41 (training, teaching). Limiting the filing to class 42 alone would leave the training activity unprotected, allowing a third party to use a similar sign without technically infringing the registered trademark.
A few practical benchmarks by sector:
Romain Waiss-Moreau regularly handles the definition of the scope of classes before filing, a step that directly conditions the level of protection obtained and the strength of the registration against a possible opposition or future infringement action.
Any natural or legal person may file a trademark with the INPI, with no condition tied to commercial status or to actual exercise of an activity at the time of filing. An individual, a sole proprietor, a commercial company, an association, or even a public authority can all file. Article L. 712-1 of the French Intellectual Property Code provides that trademark ownership can be acquired in co-ownership, opening the way to joint filings by several owners.
| Type of applicant | Specific conditions | Key risks |
|---|---|---|
| Natural person (individual, sole proprietor) | No professional status requirement. Last name, first name, and address are sufficient for identification. | The trademark is tied to the individual: in the event of a later transfer to a company, a proper transfer instrument is required. |
| Legal person (company, association, group) | Filing in the name of the legal entity, by an authorized representative. The SIREN number is required for entities registered in France. | Verify that the signatory has the power to bind the entity, otherwise the filing's validity may be challenged. |
| Co-owners (joint trademark) | Several natural or legal persons may file together. Each co-owner is identified in the register. | The absence of a written agreement among co-owners exposes them to deadlocks in case of disagreement on use or transfer. A co-ownership agreement is strongly recommended before any joint filing. |
| Collective or certification trademark | Filed by a group (trade union, association) so that its members can use the mark according to a usage regulation. | The usage regulation must be attached to the filing file; its absence results in inadmissibility of the application. |
For entities in formation, it is possible to file a trademark in the name of a company in formation, provided that the company ratifies the filing as soon as it is definitively registered. On this point, Romain Waiss-Moreau advises addressing the question of ownership before the entity is even created, in order to avoid costly transfer operations and periods of vulnerability when the trademark is not yet tied to the operating entity.
The filing procedure follows a sequence of steps whose order is not trivial. Skipping or rushing one of them exposes the application to rejection, third-party opposition, or registration of a vulnerable trademark. The total duration, absent opposition, is generally four to six months from the filing date.
| Step | Main actor | Indicative timing | Key risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Prior-rights search | Applicant or representative | Before any filing | Step not required by law but decisive: a sign identical or similar to one already registered for related goods or services can block registration or expose the applicant to an infringement action under article L. 713-2 of the French Intellectual Property Code. |
| 2. Choice of sign and classes | Applicant | Before filing | The sign must meet the conditions of article L. 711-2 of the French Intellectual Property Code (distinctive character, no descriptiveness). The selection of Nice Classification classes determines the scope of logo protection or word mark protection; an omitted class cannot be added later without a new filing. |
| 3. Online filing on the INPI portal | Applicant or representative | Day 0 (official filing date) | The filing date is the date that starts the 10-year renewable trademark protection, in accordance with article L. 712-1 of the French Intellectual Property Code. Payment of official fees is due at filing; without payment, the application is inadmissible. |
| 4. Formal examination by the INPI | INPI | A few weeks | The INPI checks the formal compliance of the file (representation of the sign, list of goods and services, payment). In case of irregularity, a regularization period is granted; without a response within that period, the application is rejected. |
| 5. Publication in the Official Industrial Property Bulletin (BOPI) | INPI | About 5 weeks after filing | Publication makes the application public and opens the opposition period for third parties. Any holder of a prior right may file an opposition from that date. |
| 6. Opposition period | Third-party prior-rights holders | 2 months from publication | During these two months, a third party may challenge the registration. In the absence of opposition, the procedure continues normally. In case of opposition, the total duration may be extended by several additional months. |
| 7. Registration and issuance of the certificate | INPI | 4 to 6 months after filing (absent opposition) | The registration is recorded in the National Trademark Register. The registration certificate attests to ownership of the trademark from the initial filing date, not from the registration date. |
The prior-rights search deserves special attention. It is not listed among the formal obligations imposed by the French Intellectual Property Code, but skipping it is one of the most common causes of post-registration difficulties. A sign registered without prior verification may turn out to conflict with an earlier trademark, exposing its owner to an infringement action or invalidity proceedings. Romain Waiss-Moreau includes this step in every filing engagement, cross-checking INPI databases with relevant European Union and international registers.
Filing on your own is technically accessible to any applicant: the INPI platform does not require third-party involvement. This accessibility is real, but it should not obscure the legal nature of the act. Registering a trademark means creating an industrial property right enforceable against third parties for ten years. An error at this stage can compromise the entire protection.
What a filing error can cost. A trademark refused for lack of distinctiveness requires a new filing, with new official fees. A trademark successfully attacked in invalidity, for lack of verified prior rights, retroactively deprives its owner of any protection. In both cases, the initial fees are lost, and the unprotected period may have allowed third parties to establish themselves in the market.
An industrial property advisor or an attorney who practices trademark law works on three distinct levels: securing the initial filing (choice of the sign, selection of classes, prior-rights search), defense in case of opposition or invalidity proceedings, and definition of a protection strategy consistent with the development of the business, including internationally. Romain Waiss-Moreau structures these engagements so that the cost of counsel is weighed not against the INPI fee alone, but against the risk avoided. Using a representative is an additional investment, but it turns an administrative act into a defensible legal asset.
Several programs allow the amount effectively paid for a trademark filing with the INPI to be reduced. These programs are primarily aimed at small and medium-sized enterprises, founders, and social-economy structures. Knowing them before filing can significantly reduce the initial financial burden, and some programs can be combined.
The amounts shown below are indicative ranges, subject to change depending on calls for proposals and prevailing regional policies. The exact conditions should be checked with each organization before submitting an application.
| Program | Beneficiaries | Indicative amount | How to apply |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bpifrance Intellectual Property Vouchers | French SMEs and mid-caps, startups | Partial coverage of advisory fees (varies by region and call for proposals) | Application filed with Bpifrance or the partner region, before any advisory fees are incurred |
| INPI fee reduction for individuals and small entities | Individuals, micro-enterprises, associations, public authorities, educational institutions | Reduction on applicable official INPI fees (rate to be checked on the INPI website) | Declaration of eligible status at the time of online filing on the INPI platform |
| Regional IP support | SMEs depending on the region (Ile-de-France, Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes, Occitanie, etc.) | Grants vary across territories, to be checked with the regional council | Inquire with the regional council or the local economic development agency |
| INPI IP pre-diagnostic support | SMEs and very small businesses that have not previously received IP advisory | Free or heavily subsidized diagnostic on the protection strategy | Direct request to the relevant INPI regional office |
The INPI fee reduction for individuals and small entities is activated directly at online filing: no prior step is required, provided the status is correctly declared. For Bpifrance vouchers, by contrast, the application must be filed before any advisory fees are incurred, otherwise the benefit is lost.
Regional support varies widely from one territory to another, both in eligibility conditions and in amounts. Some regions reserve their programs for the first filing of industrial property titles, while others open them to extensions of protection. It is therefore useful to check the availability of these programs with the regional INPI office or the local economic agency before initiating any procedure. Romain Waiss-Moreau can help companies identify the programs applicable to their situation, so that the overall cost of trademark filing with the INPI is controlled from the outset.
The official INPI rate remains accessible, but the real cost incurred when filing a trademark with the INPI depends closely on the number of classes selected and the quality of the preparatory work. The prior-rights search and the precise selection of classes are the two decisive levers: an under-targeted filing exposes the applicant to refusal, third-party opposition, or future revocation for non-use. Neglecting these steps can turn a modest investment into a costly dispute.
Romain Waiss-Moreau intervenes at each stage of this procedure, from the analysis of prior rights to the drafting of the filing file, in order to secure protection from the priority date. Contact Romain Waiss-Moreau to assess your situation and structure your trademark strategy on solid foundations.
The official INPI rates provide for a base fee covering the first class of the Nice Classification, then an additional fee for each extra class. The total amount therefore depends directly on the number of classes selected at filing. Limiting the scope to the classes strictly necessary for your activity is the most effective way to control the total expense. To learn the exact rates in force, the official INPI website publishes the updated scale.
The INPI Trademarks database, available online, allows a search by name on trademarks registered or filed in France. This search remains indicative: it does not cover unregistered prior rights, such as trade names or well-known designations. A prior-rights analysis conducted by a trademark law professional integrates these complementary sources and assesses the likelihood of confusion within the meaning of article L. 713-2 of the French Intellectual Property Code.
In accordance with article L. 712-1 of the French Intellectual Property Code, registration takes effect from the filing date for a period of ten years, indefinitely renewable. Renewal must be requested before the expiration of each ten-year period, provided the sign is not modified and the list of goods and services is not extended.
Yes, provided that the logo is expressly included in the registration application. A filing can cover a word mark (the name alone), a figurative mark (the logo alone), or a semi-figurative mark (name and logo combined). Each form constitutes a separate title. Filing only the name does not confer protection on the associated graphic representation, and vice versa. Depending on the planned commercial strategy, Romain Waiss-Moreau can help you determine the filing format best suited to your assets.
You set out your project. By the end, you will know whether one of the four services fits, or whether we should direct you elsewhere. EN or FR, Paris or New York, confidential.