
A U.S. fund investing in a French SAS receives two core documents: the bylaws (statuts) and the shareholders' agreement (pacte d'associés). U.S. practice would put most investor protections in the certificate of incorporation and an investors' rights or voting agreement. In France, the split between bylaws and agreement is more consequential, because it determines how each protection can be enforced.
This guide explains the role of the French shareholders' agreement, the clauses it usually contains and its legal limits. It introduces a series of articles on governance, leaver, tag-along, drag-along, liquidation preference and waterfall clauses.
| Criterion | Bylaws (statuts) | Shareholders' agreement (pacte) |
|---|---|---|
| Publicity | Filed with the commercial registry, public | Confidential |
| Binding on | The company, all shareholders and third parties | Only the signatories |
| Amendment | Shareholders' decision under the bylaws' majority | Usually unanimity of signatories |
| Remedy for breach | A transfer in breach of SAS bylaw approval or lock-up clauses can be voided | Mainly damages |
The practical consequence: a transfer that violates a right of first refusal set out only in the agreement generally gives rise to damages, unless the buyer knew of the clause. The same restriction in the bylaws of an SAS, combined with an approval clause, can lead to the transfer being voided. Key transfer restrictions are therefore usually mirrored in the bylaws, with the agreement detailing the procedure.
The contractual provisions can be governed by a foreign law. French mandatory corporate rules still apply to a French company, and enforcement of transfer restrictions, options and corporate decisions will take place in France. Most agreements for French companies are governed by French law, with an English version for convenience. Romain Waiss-Moreau drafts bilingual agreements that reflect U.S. market terms while remaining enforceable in France.
| U.S. document | French equivalent | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Certificate of incorporation | Bylaws (statuts) | Preferred share rights must be here |
| Stock purchase agreement | Investment agreement (protocole d'investissement) | Conditions, representations, closing |
| Investors' rights agreement | Shareholders' agreement | Information, pre-emptive rights |
| Voting agreement | Shareholders' agreement and bylaws | Board composition, drag-along |
| ROFR and co-sale agreement | Shareholders' agreement and bylaws | Pre-emption, tag-along |
| Equity incentive plan | BSPCE plan, free share plan | Different legal regimes |
This mapping helps U.S. investors find the protections they expect, even when the documents are organised differently.
| Stage | Priority clauses |
|---|---|
| Co-founders at incorporation | Vesting and leaver, exclusivity, non-compete, pre-emption, deadlock |
| Seed (angels) | Information, pre-emption, tag-along, drag-along, BSPCE holders' adherence |
| Series A and later | Strategic committee, reserved matters, liquidation preference, anti-dilution, waterfall, liquidity |
A U.S. fund leads a Series A in a French SAS using its NVCA-based term sheet. The French documentation reorganised the terms: preferred share rights and the waterfall went into the bylaws; information rights, pre-emption, tag-along, drag-along and leaver clauses into the shareholders' agreement; board composition into both. The fund received an English version of every document and a mapping memo against its usual U.S. set. The firm prepares this mapping systematically, so that investment committees can approve French deals without relearning the structure each time.
No, but every professional investor requires one.
Only if it provides for amendment by a qualified majority of signatories, which is common in agreements with many shareholders.
Often yes, so that it is bound by certain undertakings, such as information obligations or the registration of transfers in compliance with the agreement.
It is concluded for a fixed term, often eight to fifteen years, sometimes renewable. An indefinite term would allow any party to terminate at will, undermining exit clauses.
You set out your project. By the end, you will know whether one of the four services fits, or whether we should direct you elsewhere. EN or FR, Paris or New York, confidential.